1. Overview and Importance of the 183-Day Rule

The 183-day rule refers to a tax exemption system for short-term visitors included in many tax treaties. In Japan, there is an arrangement where individuals dispatched from abroad who stay for 183 days or less in a year and meet certain conditions may be exempt from income tax on their salary in Japan. This rule is a crucial mechanism to prevent double taxation and facilitate international personnel assignments. In Japan, tax treaties take precedence over domestic law; therefore, if the requirements of the 183-day rule are met, taxation may be exempted even if the income would otherwise be taxable under Japanese tax law.

For CFOs and accounting managers of foreign-affiliated companies, correctly understanding this rule is indispensable for managing tax costs. Utilizing the short-term visitor exemption system can sometimes allow the avoidance of income tax and individual income tax filing obligations in Japan. However, relying solely on the formal number of 183 days is dangerous. As will be discussed later, residency determination under Japan's domestic law is based on a substantive and comprehensive assessment of factors such as days of stay, center of vital interests, and purpose of stay, rather than the mere presence or absence of a formal address.

In cases where the tax exemption under the treaty's 183-day rule does not apply (e.g., exceeding the stay days, no treaty), domestic law will impose taxation. Therefore, it is important to distinguish and plan for cases where the short-term visitor exemption applies versus other treatments.
 

2. Criteria and Process for Non-Resident Determination

Under Japanese tax law, individuals are classified as either residents or non-residents, which dictates their scope of taxation. A resident is defined as an individual who "has a domicile (center of vital interests) in Japan" or "has a residence (dwelling) in Japan continuously for one year or more up to the present." Conversely, a non-resident is an individual who falls into neither of these categories.

This residency determination is based on whether an individual has a domicile or residence in Japan and is made by comprehensively considering various objective facts, not just the mere number of days stayed. Examples of judgment factors include "length of stay in Japan during the year," "presence of family or housing in Japan," and "whether the main place of work is in Japan."

It is particularly easy to misunderstand that "if the stay in Japan is 183 days or less, one is a non-resident." For example, if the center of one's life, including family, is in Japan, one may be deemed a resident even if the stay is less than six months. The final determination is made based on a comprehensive assessment of individual circumstances, so differences in opinion between the taxpayer and the tax authorities can lead to tax risks. Therefore, consulting with tax professionals, such as certified public tax accountants, should be considered.
 

3. Income Tax Risks Associated with Resident Determination

If an individual is determined to be a "resident" and specifically a "resident other than a non-permanent resident," all income generated both inside and outside Japan is, in principle, subject to taxation. This means that not only income generated in Japan but also salaries and investment returns earned abroad become subject to Japanese income tax.

If a high-income earner, such as a foreign national executive, is determined to be a resident other than a non-permanent resident, their taxable income in Japan could significantly increase, leading to unexpected tax burdens. Furthermore, there can be a substantial difference in applicable tax rates between residents and non-residents. Non-residents often only need to pay a 20.42% withholding tax on their Japanese income, but residents are, in principle, subject to progressive income tax (up to 45%) and additionally inhabitant tax (approximately 10%).

As such, tax burdens can more than double in some cases, highlighting how significantly tax burdens can fluctuate due to residency determination. This impact is particularly large for executives earning income outside Japan, so it is crucial to understand the tax implications of becoming a resident beforehand and implement countermeasures.
 

4. Precautions and Measures for Foreign Workers

When accepting foreign staff or executives at a foreign-affiliated company's Japanese branch, the following points regarding the 183-day rule and taxation need attention:
 

Managing Days of Stay
If the assignment period or business trip duration extends, and the stay in Japan exceeds 183 days, the short-term visitor exemption system (183-day rule) under tax treaties can no longer be applied. Confirm tax treaties with relevant countries and proactively manage the days of stay for short-term assignees and business travelers from overseas in Japan, generally keeping it within 183 days to be exempt from tax burden in Japan.

Payer of Compensation
To qualify for the short-term visitor exemption when coming to Japan, a general condition is that "the remuneration is paid by an employer who is not a resident of Japan and is not borne by a permanent establishment in Japan." Therefore, where the salary is borne and paid from is crucial. It is important to note that if the Japanese subsidiary directly pays the salary, this exemption system may not be applicable.
 

5. Background of Reassessment in Sports Player Cases

In recent years, news regarding the tax residency classification of foreign athletes has garnered attention in the professional sports world.

Specifically, there was a case in a soccer league where a foreign player residing in Japan, who was actually considered a "resident," received a substantial tax reassessment for periods where they had not filed an income tax return.

While the player and their club may have judged the player to be a non-resident based on the contract period, the tax authorities comprehensively assessed the actual circumstances of playing in Japan and the accompaniment of family, leading to the determination that the player was a Japanese resident. This case indicates that Japanese tax authorities determine residency based on the actual circumstances by comprehensively evaluating various factors, rather than merely a single formality like the contract period. This serves as a valuable lesson for managing corporate expatriates. The National Tax Agency also publishes judgment criteria for similar cases on its website.
 

6. Main Challenges Faced by Corporate Executives

Let's organize the challenges faced by foreign national executives involved with Japan, related to the 183-day rule and residency determination.

First, there is often a misunderstanding regarding residency determination. There are cases where individuals mistakenly believe "if I'm not in Japan for more than half a year (183 days), I must be a non-resident," and treat themselves as non-residents based only on business trip days, even if their life base remains in Japan.

As mentioned, in Japan, residency classification is not determined solely by the number of days stayed. If family continues to live in Japan or a home is maintained in Japan, an individual may be determined a resident even if they stay in Japan for less than 183 days. Misinterpreting tax planning due to this misunderstanding increases the risk of facing tax burdens and reassessments later.

Furthermore, for foreign national executives, the complexity of Japanese tax procedures itself is a challenge. Japan's income tax system is a self-assessment system, and once an individual becomes a resident, they must follow tax procedures different from their home country, such as year-end adjustment, individual income tax filing, and application of various deductions. It is not uncommon for individuals to have never filed an income tax return in their home country, and the fact that forms and necessary documents are in Japanese can also be a hurdle.

Moreover, executives may struggle with understanding documents from the tax office or statutory records like withholding tax slips distributed by their employer.
 

7. Strategies to Avoid Tax Risks

To avoid tax risks related to the 183-day rule, here are the main strategies for companies:
 

Pre-Assignment Planning and Consultation with Tax Professionals
Once an overseas assignment or business trip is decided, simulate the applicability of tax treaties (e.g., 183-day rule, director's remuneration clause) and residency determination under domestic law. Consult with tax professionals, such as certified public tax accountants, and adjust stay periods and contract terms to prevent unexpected taxation.

Establishing Internal Rules
It is also important to establish internal rules regarding days of stay and compensation payment methods for employees on international assignments and to formalize tax compliance. For example, implement rules such as "report business trips that may conflict with the 183-day rule to HR or accounting in advance" or "assignees receive annual tax consultations," creating a system for early problem detection and resolution within the organization.

Utilizing Tax Professionals
If a company lacks sufficient international tax expertise internally, leveraging the support of tax professionals is a wise strategy. By conducting preliminary tax consultations when accepting foreign national executives and receiving proposals for optimal tax countermeasures, risks can be significantly reduced. It is also beneficial to provide tax orientations to the assignees themselves upon arrival or at year-end, explaining key aspects of Japan's tax system and procedures.

By implementing such strategies, companies can mitigate tax risks associated with foreign national executives. Since cases often involve substantial tax amounts, management should take planned and organized action.
 

8. Conclusion

Tax judgments regarding Japan's "183-day rule" are an unavoidable topic for CFOs and accounting managers of foreign-affiliated companies. This article has provided a simplified explanation from its overview to the residency determination process, differences in tax scope by residency classification, and even actual case studies and countermeasures.

Finally, it must be emphasized that the 183-day rule and residency determination are "judged by substance over form." Tax authorities prioritize the actual extent to which an individual lives and works in Japan, rather than just the contract period or superficial number of days.

We hope this article proves helpful in managing tax risks for foreign-affiliated companies operating with global human resources.

Contact us

Complete this form and an RSM Shiodome Partners representative will be in touch.