What is Japan's Unique Corporate Form, the Godo Kaisha? Including Examples from Foreign-Affiliated Companies

1. Basic Overview of the Godo Kaisha in Japan

The Godo Kaisha (GK), or Limited Liability Company, is a corporate form introduced in Japan through the 2006 Companies Act revision. Like a Kabushiki Kaisha (KK), or Stock Company, a GK possesses legal personality, and all investors are limited liability members (their liability is limited to their investment amount). A key difference from a KK is that the investors and those who manage the company are the same, illustrating what is known as "unity of ownership and management."

A GK can be established by creating articles of incorporation and filing a registration application with the competent Legal Affairs Bureau. Unlike a KK, notarization of the articles of incorporation by a public notary is not required, and there is no minimum capital requirement, allowing establishment with as little as JPY 1. Furthermore, a company can be established with just one investor, making it a flexible system suitable for small starts.

Legally, it holds the same status as a KK as a "company," and for tax purposes, it is generally treated in the same way as a KK. However, it possesses simpler characteristics regarding organizational structure and operational rules compared to a KK. Next, we will examine its unique institutional characteristics and background in Japan.

2. What is Japan's Unique Corporate Form?

Japan's Godo Kaisha was introduced based on the model of the LLC (Limited Liability Company) commonly found in the United States. However, it is a unique Japanese system and not entirely identical to the U.S. LLC.

Firstly, from a tax perspective, pass-through taxation (a system where the business entity itself is not taxed, but its members are), as adopted by U.S. LLCs, does not apply under Japan's Corporate Income Tax Act. A GK, like a KK, is subject to corporate taxation, and a tax obligation arises in Japan.

From an organizational operation standpoint, Japan's GK is a corporate form that allows for broad autonomy within the scope defined by the Companies Act. Under Japan's legal framework, a GK is a company with legal personality, yet it permits more flexible operations than a KK.

Thus, while a GK can be called a Japanese version of an LLC, it is legally a corporate form unique to Japan. Although its name is similar to the U.S. LLC, which often leads to confusion, when establishing a GK in Japan, one must adhere to domestic laws and procedures. For CFOs and accounting managers of foreign-affiliated companies, it is crucial to correctly understand Japan's GK system and determine if it suits their company's needs.
 

3. Main Advantages of a Godo Kaisha

The Godo Kaisha offers many advantages when establishing and operating a subsidiary in Japan. Its representative benefits are as follows:

Low Establishment and Operating Costs
Compared to a KK, a GK can significantly reduce initial costs. Furthermore, since there are no mandatory executive terms or public financial reporting obligations, post-establishment maintenance costs and administrative burdens are also reduced.

Simplified Governance and Rapid Decision-Making
Since investors (members) are directly involved in management, important decisions can be made without going through a shareholders' meeting or board of directors. If the parent company provides 100% of the investment, it can directly reflect the parent company's intentions, making it a corporate form capable of rapidly implementing global policies.

Tax Benefits for the Parent Company
While the corporate income tax in Japan is the same as for a KK, if the parent company is, for example, a U.S. entity, establishing a Japanese subsidiary as a GK may allow the parent company to apply pass-through taxation. This can centralize taxation of profits and losses generated in Japan at the parent company level, optimizing the overall tax burden for the group.
 

4. Disadvantages and Considerations of a Godo Kaisha

On the other hand, there are also disadvantages of a Godo Kaisha that warrant attention. Specifically, these points include:

Brand Recognition and Credibility
Although GKs are increasing, they are not as widely recognized as KKs. In Japan, the recognition of KKs tends to be overwhelmingly higher. While legally having the same legal personality as a KK, a company named "○○ Godo Kaisha" might be perceived as a small-scale enterprise, potentially leading to a disadvantage in terms of credibility from business partners and financial institutions.

(Please refer to the following article for a detailed explanation of the differences between a KK and a GK: "Differences between Kabushiki Kaisha and Godo Kaisha | RSM Shiodome Partners Judicial Scrivener Office")

Inability to Go Public
Since a GK does not issue shares, it cannot raise capital through a stock market listing. If an IPO is planned for the future, a KK must be chosen from the outset. While it is possible to change an organization from a GK to a KK after establishment, additional procedures and costs will be incurred.

Restrictions on External Fundraising
Due to the inability to raise capital by issuing shares, it is not suitable for large-scale third-party investments. Even when welcoming new investors, the consent of all members and procedures for transferring equity stakes are required, which can be cumbersome. Furthermore, the inability to use diverse schemes like preferred shares may make it less appealing to venture investors.

Risk Due to Investors Being Managers
Since all investors are involved in management, conflicts between co-investors can directly lead to stagnation in management. There is almost no form of acceptance for minority shareholders, meaning that trust among members will be more crucial compared to a KK.

5. Examples of Famous Companies Choosing the Godo Kaisha Form

Case 1:
Amazon's Japanese subsidiary, Amazon Japan K.K., reorganized into a Godo Kaisha in 2016 through an absorption-type merger with Amazon Japan Logistics K.K., becoming Amazon Japan G.K.

Case 2:
Japanese retail giant Seiyu, while promoting management reforms under U.S. Walmart's umbrella, reorganized from a Kabushiki Kaisha to a Godo Kaisha in 2009. (Note: It reorganized back into a Kabushiki Kaisha in 2022).

6. Why Do Foreign Companies Choose the Godo Kaisha Form?

Reasons companies choose the Godo Kaisha include rapid decision-making, parent company-led operations, simplified governance, and optimized tax burden.

For example, in the case of entry from the U.S., establishing a GK in Japan, which does not have a shareholders' meeting or board of directors, allows for rapid reflection of U.S. headquarters' decisions into Japanese operations, enabling agile management led by the headquarters. Furthermore, from a tax perspective, applying pass-through taxation with the U.S. headquarters can optimize overall group tax efficiency.

Additionally, by simplifying the organization of headquarters and stores, companies can establish a system that quickly permeates parent company policies, such as efficient operational processes and the implementation of an Everyday Low Price (EDLP) strategy. As a wholly-owned subsidiary, the complex institutional design and disclosure obligations of a listed company are unnecessary, and concentrating governance at the headquarters through the GK structure is also an attractive feature.
 

7. Applicability to Foreign-Affiliated Companies

Based on the characteristics above, whether a foreign-affiliated company should choose the Godo Kaisha as its subsidiary form in Japan depends on the company's objectives and circumstances. Generally, if a company wishes to operate agilely as a wholly-owned subsidiary of its parent company and does not require future public listing, the advantages of a GK (cost reduction, governance flexibility) can be effectively utilized. On the other hand, if local credibility is crucial for the industry or if third-party fundraising or public listing is envisioned, a KK would be more suitable.

From a tax perspective, there is no difference between the two forms within Japan. However, for U.S. companies, for example, becoming a GK can offer the advantage of utilizing pass-through taxation at the parent company level. When a CFO of a foreign-affiliated company establishes a subsidiary in Japan, they will likely need to carefully choose the corporate form by comparing such points.

8. Conclusion

The Godo Kaisha in Japan offers many advantages for foreign-affiliated companies as a subsidiary form in terms of cost and operation. It particularly excels in ease of establishment, management flexibility, and integrated operation with the parent company. As demonstrated by cases like Amazon and Seiyu, depending on the strategy, it can be a powerful vehicle supporting success in the Japanese market. However, caution is needed regarding future fundraising and the possibility of public listing, and it is not universally suitable for all companies.

We hope that the advantages, disadvantages, and case studies mentioned in this article will serve as a reference for determining the optimal corporate form in light of your company's Japan strategy. Choosing the appropriate corporate form will make the expansion of foreign companies into Japan smoother and stronger.


 

Contact us

Complete this form and an RSM Shiodome Partners representative will be in touch.