In this volatile and unpredictable environment, traditional models of risk management are no longer sufficient. A reactive, compliance-oriented posture is a recipe for disruption and value destruction. The imperative for today's global enterprises is to build deep, structural resilience into every facet of their international transactions.

This transformation is not a temporary deviation but a structural change. The intensifying rivalry between the United States and China, exacerbated by systemic shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's war in Ukraine, has accelerated a move toward what the Munich Security Report 2024 terms "securitized globalization". Governments are no longer focused solely on the absolute benefits of global cooperation but are increasingly concerned with relative gains, leading to "lose-lose dynamics" that jeopardize cooperation and undermine the predictability essential for efficient market functioning.    

For multinational corporations and institutional investors, this new reality presents an unprecedented array of challenges. The regulatory landscape is fragmenting along geopolitical lines, with nations deploying a sophisticated and often extraterritorial toolkit of tariffs, sanctions, export controls, and investment screening mechanisms to project power and protect national security interests. Simultaneously, a new wave of non-financial regulations, linking trade to environmental and human rights standards, is adding further layers of complexity and demanding radical transparency in global supply chains.

This article was written by Lorena Velo ([email protected]) and Marius Ungureanu ([email protected]). Lorena and Marius are consultants with RSM Netherlands Business Consulting with a focus on supply chain management.  

The primacy of the regulatory pillar

The 5-Star International Transaction Model provides a framework for global operations through five pillars: Commercial, Trade Regulatory, Financial, Ethical, and Sustainability. Historically viewed as co-equals, the Trade Regulatory pillar has now emerged as the foundational gatekeeper, dictating the feasibility of all other strategic initiatives. A failure in commercial strategy can be mitigated with new marketing, and a financial challenge can be addressed with new capital. However, a significant regulatory breach, leading to heavy fines, the loss of export privileges, or even criminal prosecution can inflict irreversible damage. An export ban can instantly sever a company from its key markets, rendering its commercial strategy obsolete. Sanctions can freeze assets and destroy investor confidence, triggering a financial crisis. Therefore, the Trade Regulatory pillar is not merely one among five; it is the bedrock upon which all other pillars rest.

The end of predictability: The weaponization of trade policy

The primary catalyst for this shift is the "weaponization of trade policy," where trade rules are no longer just tools for economic management but instruments of geopolitical power. This has created a deeply unstable and unpredictable environment, invalidating long-term planning that relied on stable trade agreements.

The aggressive US tariff strategy exemplifies this trend, with baseline tariffs of 10% on global imports and specific levies soaring to 50% on steel and 25% on automobiles. The constant threat of escalating duties, such as a potential 30% tariff on all EU goods, paralyzes strategic decision-making. This transforms regulatory risk from a calculable cost into an existential threat. The long-held doctrine of "just-in-time" manufacturing and pure cost optimization is fundamentally broken, as its core assumption of a stable, rules-based global system has evaporated. When a key market can be rendered unviable overnight by a sudden tariff, supply chain architecture becomes a board-level strategic imperative.

This is multiplied by the "compound crisis" where companies face both direct threats (tariffs on their own goods) and indirect shocks. For example, during the US-China trade war, high US tariffs on Chinese goods caused a "trade diversion effect." Chinese products like auto parts and electronics, shut out of the US market, were redirected to the euro area and across the rest of the world. This forced European firms, already facing uncertainty in the US market, to simultaneously contend with a surge of lower-cost competition in their own domestic markets.1 In response to this new reality, leading companies are shifting from reactive compliance to proactive operational realignment, prioritizing resilience over pure efficiency.

The paradigm shift: From "Just-in-Time" to "Just-in-Case"

The "just-in-time" model, with its lean inventories and concentrated production in distant, low-cost regions, has become an unacceptable vulnerability. It is being rapidly replaced by a "just-in-case" strategy focused on resilience. This involves:

  • Diversifying suppliers to build redundancy.
  • Increasing inventory buffers for critical components.
  • Regionalizing supply networks through nearshoring to reduce exposure to geopolitical flashpoints.

The nearshoring trend in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) is a prime example. For European firms, CEE offers a powerful combination of lower labor costs, modern infrastructure (motorway networks grew 280% from 2000-2023), a skilled workforce, and regulatory alignment with the EU. Moving production from Asia to CEE reduces shipping times from 30-40 days by sea to just 1-3 days by truck. This is a strategic de-risking maneuver, with any cost premium effectively serving as an insurance policy against tariffs, sanctions, or geopolitical disruption.

Furthermore, a robust internal compliance program is no longer a cost center but a powerful competitive differentiator. A demonstrable record of compliance builds trust, accelerates customs clearance, and makes a company a preferred partner for other compliance-conscious firms and investors.

The convergence of regulation, ethics, and sustainability

The lines between trade regulation and Ethical, Social, and Governance (ESG) mandates are blurring. Governments now use trade policy, such as import bans and sanctions to enforce ESG standards globally, turning "soft" ethical commitments into "hard" legal obligations.

A single point of failure in the ESG domain can trigger a devastating chain reaction. For instance, a fashion retailer using cotton from a region under forced labor sanctions faces a simultaneous:

  1. Regulatory Crisis: Import bans and fines.
  2. Ethical Crisis: Complicity in human rights abuses.
  3. Commercial Crisis: Consumer boycotts and brand damage.
  4. Financial Crisis: Investor divestment.

This interconnectedness means proactive ESG management is now a critical regulatory risk mitigation strategy. The investment in supply chain transparency and human rights due diligence is no longer just for brand building, it is for building a regulatory shield against severe legal and financial penalties.

Forward thinking

To thrive in this new environment, corporate leadership must adopt a new strategic posture that places regulatory foresight at the heart of the enterprise.

  1. Integrate Regulatory Foresight into Core Strategy: Regulatory analysis must be an upstream input for all major decisions, including market entry, M&A, and sourcing. Geopolitical and regulatory stability must be vetted before decisions are made based on cost alone.
  2. Align Corporate Strategy with National and Bloc-Level Policy: Proactively aligning investments with macro-level policy goals, such as the EU's push for "strategic autonomy," can unlock public support, streamlined financing, and regulatory goodwill. This transforms a company from a passive subject of regulation into an active partner.
  3. Forge Durable Advantage Through Regulatory Discipline: The ultimate source of competitive advantage in a complex world is the mastery of complexity. By developing a sophisticated, enterprise-wide discipline in navigating global trade regulation, companies become faster, more reliable, and more trusted. This minimizes exposure to catastrophic disruptions and leverages compliance as a strategic asset to forge a lasting commercial advantage.

RSM is a thought leader in the field of Strategy and Supply Chain consulting. We provide frequent insights through training and the sharing of thought leadership, based on our detailed knowledge of industry developments and practical applications gained from working with our customers. To discuss a strategy for building structural resilience and navigating the new trade regulatory landscape, please contact one of our consultants.  

Do you have a question? We will get back to you as soon as possible.