AUTHOR
Enterprise Resilience as a domain as evolved a great deal, primarily considering major technological developments, increasing cyber threats, lessons learned from major technological and non-technological disasters and globalisation.
So is the domain changing? Yes. As the business environment is becoming increasingly complex and interconnected, there is recognition across every industry of the importance of preparedness, adaptability, and resilience.
One of the most significant shifts has been the integration of business continuity planning into broader enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks, helping Australian organisations better align resilience strategies with governance, compliance, and strategic risk priorities. Cyber security has become a dominant focus, with continuity plans increasingly embedding protections against ransomware, data breaches, and IT infrastructure compromise, also been driven by obligations and requirements under frameworks like the ASD Essential Eight, APRA CPS 230, and the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act.
The move to cloud computing and virtualised environments has offered flexibility and redundancy benefits to organisations. But it has also introduced risks around vendor dependency, data sovereignty, and real-time availability, especially for critical sectors like healthcare, finance, and energy.
There is also an increased push in many Australian organisations to strengthen supply chain resilience by diversifying vendors, mapping dependencies, and creating upstream and downstream continuity plans. At the same time, recent large scale incidents have brought to attention the human element which supports remote operations, strengthening communication protocols during crises, and preparing staff by adequate awareness measures to respond to a range of scenarios, from IT cyber incidents to natural disasters.
There is an increased emphasis and importance on testing and exercising, partially driven by compliance and regulatory pressures but also from lessons learned from industry incidents increasing board oversight. The trend is towards simulations that combine cyber, operational, and reputational dimensions.
Finally, utilisation of data analytics and AI-powered predictive tools is being seen as an critical enabler to anticipate disruptions and making real-time decisions.
Intersection with Cyber Incident Management
The intersection of business continuity and cyber incident management has become central to enterprise resilience, especially for Australian organisations confronting a rising tide organisational disruptions and regulatory pressures.
The modern enterprise resilience approach is now focussing on a unified framework that integrates both physical and digital risk response. For senior leaders in Australia, this means ensuring proactive risk assessments address both natural and cyber threats, implementing layered controls and redundancies to mitigate impacts, and maintaining coordinated, cross-functional response capabilities across IT, executive, legal, and communications teams.
Moving away from the traditional approach of separate focus on business continuity and cyber incident response and adapting to this convergence means a holistic, intelligence-informed and action-oriented resilience strategy that will empower Australian organisations to detect early, respond fast, and recover confidently in the face of modern disruptions.
Intersection with Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)
Enterprise resilience and Zero Trust architecture form a mutually reinforcing foundation for managing modern threats and ensuring continuity of services. Enterprise resilience goes beyond traditional business continuity by integrating adaptive capabilities across operations, supply chains, and technology.
When aligned with Zero Trust—an architecture that assumes no implicit trust across digital environments—organisations can significantly improve their risk posture. This integration enables targeted protection of critical services, supports operational continuity through embedded security controls, and aligns with local frameworks such as the ASD Essential Eight, ISM, VPDSS, and APRA CPS 230.
Furthermore, this integration strengthens incident response by blending real-time cyber detection with structured recovery playbooks relevant to public and private sectors alike.
The key pillars of this integration are as follows:
Pillar | Description |
Integrated Risk Management | Align enterprise resilience strategy with Zero Trust principles to address both physical and cyber threats |
Enhanced Operational Continuity | Embed layered cybersecurity controls—such as micro-segmentation and least privilege access within resilience plans to safeguard essential services, systems, and citizen-facing functions |
Resilient Infrastructure | Reinforce system availability through Zero Trust aligned architectures that can maintain uptime during ransomware attacks, outages, or third-party disruptions |
End to end Incident Response and Recovery | Merge cyber detection capabilities with enterprise-wide response protocols to rapidly contain incidents, protect assets, and ensure coordinated communications with regulators and the public |
Continuous Improvement | Emphasize on iterative improvements, with proactive testing, lessons-learned cycles, and alignment with evolving standards like APRA CPS 230 and NIST CSF 2.0. |
A culture of continuous uplift ensures that lessons from breaches, disruptions, and drills are fed back into strategy—allowing organisations to remain resilient in the face of major disruptions such as ransomware, supply chain compromise, and insider threats. This approach is driving enterprise resilience to being not just as a compliance activity, but as a strategic enabler of trust, availability, and long-term operational assurance.
Resilience Management in OT
Building enterprise resilience in Operational Technology (OT) environments, such as energy grids, water treatment plants, mining operations, transport networks, and critical manufacturing, requires a tailored approach that reflects the unique constraints of industrial systems. OT systems operate in real-time, are often decades old, and underpin Australia's critical infrastructure and essential services.
To build enterprise resilience across Operational Technology (OT) environments, Australian organisations are going beyond traditional cyber security and adopting a comprehensive strategy tailored to the industrial context. This includes conducting OT-specific risk assessments that address safety and service continuity, maintaining a real-time inventory of critical assets, and deploying access controls that protect legacy and connected systems alike.
Network segmentation, anomaly detection, and coordinated incident response planning—aligned with appropriate regulatory frameworks—are the focus areas for implementation for organisations with critical OT assets to minimise operational disruptions. Robust offline backups, configuration control, and continuous training are ensuring both operational and technical teams are able to detect, withstand, and recover from cyber-physical threats.
In Australia's regulated and critical infrastructure sectors, resilience planning must also demonstrate adherence to frameworks like the AESCSF, IEC 62443, and the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act. Together, these actions are enabling organisations to safeguard public trust, worker safety, and the reliability of essential services.
Contribution of AI
As Australian organisations navigate increasing disruptions, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming a critical enabler of enterprise resilience. It is shifting resilience from being reactive to becoming predictive, adaptive, and enabling continuous improvement.
AI enhances enterprise resilience by providing advanced capabilities in the areas of proactive risk identification and mitigation, automation for service continuity, improving business workflows, enabling faster and efficient audit workflows, providing real-time situational intelligence during incidents, capabilities for uninterrupted customer and citizen services as well as smart, collaboration tools.
AI is reshaping the expectations and capabilities of enterprise resilience in Australia. Moving beyond traditional risk response, AI is empowering organisations to predict, adapt, and recover from disruption with greater speed and confidence.
From automating business processes and securing supply chains to enabling real-time decision-making and asset monitoring, AI technologies directly address Australia’s unique resilience challenges. By utilising AI as part of resilience planning, Australian organisations can not only reduce risk and downtime but also enhance agility, service continuity, and public trust in the face of growing uncertainty.
Conclusion
In summary, enterprise resilience is no longer just about disaster recovery or static continuity plans. Organisations are increasingly looking to this function as a dynamic, integrated capability.
For Australian senior leaders, evolving enterprise resilience means embedding risk-informed, cyber aware, and technology enabled proactive approaches into everyday critical operations. It enables continuous improvement, executive ownership, and investment in agility and foresight to thrive amid uncertainty.
For more information, please contact your local RSM adviser.