Key takeaways:
Recent tax changes have reduced some of the benefits that historically made residential property a preferred investment, potentially affecting future returns and market values.
Shares can provide broad exposure across companies, industries and global markets, while allowing investors to buy or sell much more quickly than property.
The better investment depends on your goals, risk tolerance, financial circumstances and market conditions. Both shares and property can play a valuable role in a long-term strategy.
Should I invest in shares or property?
This question has taken on new urgency following the 2026 Federal Budget, which changed tax settings that had long favoured owning residential property.
Unfortunately, there is no single answer to whether shares or property make the better investment. Few things in life are that black and white, as the right choice depends on your objectives, financial situation, risk tolerance and the prevailing market conditions.
While we cannot tell you which asset class is better, what we can do is unpack the tax benefits, risks and practical trade-offs of each asset class so you can make an informed decision.
Because ultimately, the decision between investing in property and shares comes back to a very simple question: what will get you the best return?
Why is property investment so popular in Australia?
For decades, property has enjoyed a set of tailwinds that often made it the default choice for Australian investors.
These favourable elements include:

a low cost of capital
(lower interest rates for home loans)
favourable tax settings such as negative gearing
(offsetting personal income against investment property losses) and the 50% capital gains tax (CGT) discount
familiarity:
most people understand the housing market on a basic, intuitive level
Familiarity and intuitive appeal do a lot of work here. Investors tend to know the good suburbs, how house prices in other areas are tracking, what a desirable home looks like and whether rental demand is strong. This familiarity has historically driven far more Australians into property than into shares.
How have 2026 tax changes affected property investment?
Impacts from the 2026 Federal Budget are being felt across property markets throughout Australia. Changes to the CGT discount have now passed through the Australian Parliament, alongside changes to negative gearing laws on property.
Some of the tailwinds that once supported property valuations and returns have turned against the asset class, and we're starting to see falls in many markets as a result.
![]()
Shares, property, or both?
Get tailored advice on building wealth, managing risk and creating an investment strategy aligned to your financial goals.
Is investing in shares risky?
Many people view the share market as inherently risky, which may be technically true, but misses a lot of nuance. People tend to make decisions based on perceptions of risk (or potential gain) rather than an objective analysis of risk vs reward. With shares, every market movement is visible, which increases our perception of the risk.
Consider driving. Most people accept its risks without dwelling on them. But if your car displayed a live, constantly changing probability of having an accident, then you would probably be more worried about getting behind the wheel. Information makes the risk more visible, not necessarily greater.
Because share prices update constantly, investors have instant visibility of exactly what their holdings are worth on any given day. Property values also fluctuate, but the level of transparency isn’t the same, so those movements can feel less immediate and thus don’t generate the same sense of concern.
But ultimately, the decision comes back to the type of return you're chasing and your tolerance for watching that return move in real time.
What are the different ways to invest in shares and property?
There is more than one way to invest in both shares and property. The typical way to invest in property is to buy residential property directly. Shares offer more options:
- buy direct shares, taking a position in a publicly traded company such as Commonwealth Bank, BHP or Telstra.
- invest indirectly through a passive or active fund manager who either picks shares for you or simply buys the entire market, such as the top 300 shares on the ASX
Each of these approaches has its pros and cons, and your experience and market knowledge will help determine your best way forward.
- If you have the time, energy and requisite understanding of business and markets, individual shares let you back companies you believe represent good long-term investments
- For a more hands-off investment strategy, a passive, market-tracking basket of shares, such as the ASX 300, spreads your exposure automatically
- If you prefer a tangible asset and a more familiar market, direct residential property remains the traditional entry point for property investors.
What are the risks and rewards of each investment approach?
Each path carries trade-offs. Investing in individual shares can deliver outsized gains, but there is the risk of large falls in those prices. Investing in a basket of shares is a balanced approach that spreads the risk, which generally lowers the likelihood of both extreme losses and extreme gains. Even so, a diversified basket of shares, can still fluctuate by over 20% within a short time frame, so volatility is never fully eliminated.
How do you know what your investment is worth?
This is the key difference between property and shares: with shares, you see fluctuations in value in real time, with a concrete number showing your portfolio is up or down. With property, the true value of your investment is largely unknown until you actually go to sell.
That uncertainty has a psychological upside as well as a downside. Not knowing what you've got until settlement day can be frustrating, but it also offers a kind of psychological protection from having to confront unrealised losses on a daily basis.
Liquidity considerations when investing in shares vs property
Liquidity can also be a major consideration. Property can be very illiquid: unless you're willing to accept a bargain-basement price, a property may take considerable time to sell, particularly in softer market conditions. Shares are more liquid, but come with other considerations. If you go to sell, you're often either selling at the market price and getting your money quite quickly, or, if you don't believe the market price is fair value, waiting until it reaches a point you believe is fair (which may take months or years.) Crucially though, if you do need to sell quickly in any kind of market, you exit and have cash in your account within days.That short-term flexibility can matter a great deal if you're relying on investment income or need to fund an unexpected expense, particularly once you factor in maintenance costs, interest rates and other ongoing cash flow demands of property ownership.
How easy is it to diversify with shares versus property?
Shares make it far easier to spread your bets. Gaining exposure to different companies and geographies, including the United States, Europe, Japan or China, is much simpler than achieving the same diversification through property. This can spread your risk around and create a more resilient portfolio than being tied to one house, in one street, in one suburb. Timing is easier too.
When markets are quite low or depressed, you can act quickly and buy shares to take advantage of low prices. Likewise, when markets are moving quickly, you can exit and take profits very quickly.
Property is slower: even in quite active markets, you're looking at a minimum of a month or more from deciding to sell to actually selling, and then settlement can take another month or more after that. For buyers and sellers who may need funds at short notice, the ability to access cash quickly through shares can be worth riding out share market volatility.

So, is it better to invest in shares or property?
At the end of the day, there's no universal winner. The answer to the question depends on the specifics of what you're buying, current market conditions and interest rates at the time, and your own objectives and financial situation. A good investment can be found in either asset class.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. A qualified financial adviser can assess your objectives, financial situation, risk tolerance and tax position before recommending an investment strategy, rather than relying on general rules of thumb.
Interest rates directly affect property investors through mortgage repayments and borrowing costs, which influence cash flow and rental yield. Share investors feel the effects more indirectly, as interest rates influence company earnings, valuations and overall market conditions.
Yes. Many investors hold both asset classes to balance the steady rental income and tax benefits of property with the liquidity and diversification that shares provide. A property manager can help with the practical side of owning an investment property, while a financial adviser can help balance this against a broader share portfolio.
Have a question?
Get in touch
Speak with an adviser today and gain clarity on your next investment move
Speak with an adviser today and gain clarity on your next investment move
Ideas and insights